Perbandingan Hasil Pemeriksaan Morfologi Spermatozoa Manusia Menggunakan Metode Pewarnaan Papanicolaou, Diff Quik, Dan Safranin-Kristal Violet Pada Pasien Infertil di Klinik Telkomedika Ratulangi Makassar

Authors

  • Rahmawati Thamrin Program Studi Pendidikan Dokter Universitas Bosowa
  • Hengky Lukas Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Sidoarjo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35965/eco.v24i1.4266

Keywords:

Spermatozoa, Pewarnaan, Papanicolaou, Diff Quik, Safranin-Kristal Violet, Pasien Infertil

Abstract

Pemeriksaan sperma sangat penting dalam mengetahui masalah kesuburan pada pria. Dalam pemeriksaan sperma terdapat pemeriksaan utama yaitu konsentrasi, motilitas dan morfologi. Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan metode pemeriksaan morfologi pada Analisa sperma yaitu motode Papanicolaou, Safranin, dan Diff Quik dalam mengevaluasi morfologi sperma untuk mendapatkan hasil terbaik dalam menilai infertilitas pria. Rancangan penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian laboratorium observasional analitik yang dilakukan pada pasien yang datang ke Klinik Telkomedika pada bulan September 2019 – januari 2020. Penelitian meneliti morfologi spermatozoa dari pada pasien infertil dan diperiksa dengan 3 metode:  Papanicolaou, Saffranin dan Diffquik lalu bandingkan. Hasilnya, total pasien yang diperiksa morfologi spermanya dengan Saffranin dan Diffquik selama lima bulan di Klinik Telkomedika dari bulan September 2019 hingga Januari 2020 sebanyak 90 orang diambil spermanya dan diperiksa morfologi spermanya dengan Metode Papanicolaou, Saffranin dan Diffquik. Hasil analisis statistik menemukan bahwa terdapat signifikansi antara dua metode yang kami uji. Pada kategori panjang dan lebar terdapat perbedaan bermakna p < a antara Diffquik-Saffranin Crystal Violet dan Diffquik-Papanicolaou. Hal serupa juga terjadi pada kategori vakula, melintang, bagian tengah, dan ERC. Pada metode ketiganya menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan. Hasil studi menyarankan evaluasi morfologi spermatozoa yang paling tepat adalah dengan menggunakan Saffranin Crystal Violet.

Sperm examination is very important in finding out fertility problems in men. In sperm examination, there are main examinations, namely concentration, motility and morphology. This study is to determine the difference in morphological examination methods in sperm analysis, namely Papanicolaou, Safranin, and Diff Quik methods in evaluating sperm morphology to get the best results in assessing male infertility. The research design used was analytical observational laboratory research conducted on patients who came to the Telkomedika Clinic in September 2019 - January 2020. The study examined the morphology of spermatozoa from infertile patients and examined with 3 methods:  Papanicolaou, Saffranin and Diffquik and then compared. As a result, a total of 90 patients who were examined for sperm morphology with Saffranin and Diffquik for five months at the Telkomedika Clinic from September 2019 to January 2020 had their sperm taken and examined for sperm morphology using the Papanicolaou, Saffranin and Diffquik methods. The results of statistical analysis found that there was significance between the two methods we tested.  In the length and width categories, there was a significant difference of p < a between Diffquik-Saffranin Crystal Violet and Diffquik-Papanicolaou. The same was true for the vacuoles, transverse, central, and ERC categories. All three methods showed significant differences. The study results suggest that the most appropriate evaluation of spermatozoa morphology is by using Saffranin Crystal Violet.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S Pieters, Onny.1978,Kuliah Analysa Sperma Universitas Airlangga.pp13

Anonim,1996. Journal of Clinical Microbiology.volume 34 No10;[1 screen].Available at:http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov>articles>pdf

Assessment of Spermatozoa Morphology under Light Microscopy with Different Histologic Stains and Comparison of Morphometric Measurements. Available at:http// www.scielo.cl/pdf/ijmorphol/v30n4/art45.pdf

Barroso G, Mercan R, Ozgur K, Morshedi M, Kolm P, Coetzee K, et al. Intra- and inter- laboratory variability in the assessment of sperm morphology by strict criteria: impact of semen preparation, staining techniques and manual versus computerized analysis. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2036-40.

Moeloek, N.1983, Standarisasi Analisis Semen Manusia;Per.Biok.Ind.Jakarta. 1983.

Coetzee K, Kruger TF, Lobard CJ, Shaughnessy D, Oehringer S, Özgür K, et al. Assessment of interlaboratory and intralaboratory sperm morphology readings with the use of a Hamilton Thorne Research integrated visual optical system semen analyzer. Fertil Steril 1999;71:80-4.

Henkel R, Schreiber G, Sturmhoefel A, Hipler UC, Zermann DH, Menkveld R. Comparison of three staining methods for the morphological evaluation of human spermatozoa. Fertil Steril 2008;89:449-55.

Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF, Swanson RJ, Matta JF, Oehringer S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1988;49:112-7.

Menkveld R, Stander FSH, Kotze TJVW, Kruger TF, van Zyl JA. The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. Hum Reprod 1990;5:586-92.

World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 4th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.

World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

Anonim, 2006. Staining Theory.pdf., pp 68-91. Alvailable at: http//www.scribt.com>mobile>doc

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30