Writing Daily Status On Social Media: Code-Mixing Phenomena At Sekolah Advent Makassar

Carolina Mewengkang; Sukardi Weda; Sudriman  Maca

doi:10.35965/bje.v3i2.2627

Authors

Carolina Mewengkang English Education Departmen, Graduate Program, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia
Sukardi Weda English Education Departmen, Graduate Program, State University of Makassar, Indonesia
Sudriman Maca English Education Departmen, Graduate Program, Universitas Bosowa, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35965/bje.v3i2.2627

Keywords:

Code Mixing, Social Media, Sociolinguistics

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the using of code mixing on social media at the Elevent Grade of Sekolah Advent Makassar. This research applied descriptive qualitative research. Data collection technique by using an observation and interview. Purposive sampling is the technique to chose the subject. There were 5 Students as subject from 26 students. The data was taken by the screeshot observation to know their type of code mixing on Instagram. The researchers interviewed for the 5 students to know about the students’ reasons using code mixing in writing status. Based on the results of the observation, interviews and recording that have been conducted, students used type of code mixing dominant is insertion in writing daily satus and ther reasons students’ used code mixing in writing daily status are less of English vocabulary and social community. The researcher found that the highest reason of using code mxing by the students is that they have less English vocabulary. This proves that the role of social media and community is very important at this ages and Students’ involvement in every situation to express their languages

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Arif, T. Z. Z. (2019). The Use of Social Media for English Language Learning: An Exploratory Study of EFL University Students. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 3(2), 224-233.

Ahmed, M. A. (2019). Arabic in Modern Hebrew Texts. In Arabic in Modern Hebrew Texts. Edinburgh University Press.

Alim, S., Purwasetiawatik, T. F., Saudi, A. N. A., & Susanti, S. (2022). The Short Version of IPIP-BFM Scale Properties Based on Bugis-Makassar Cultural Background: Do the Items Match with Javanese Culture? JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v11i2.23404

Ayeomoni, M. O. (2006). Code-switching and code-mixing: Style of language use in childhood in Yoruba speech community. Nordic journal of African studies, 15(1).

Baker, C. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. Multilingual matters.

Dictionaries, O. (2013). Oxford English Dictionary (Vol. 7). Oxford University Press.

Florentina, T., & Alim, S. (2020). Factors Analysis of IPIP-BFM-50 as Big Five Personality Measurement in Bugis-Makassar Culture. Ecosystem, 20, 156–167.

Hudson, R. A. (1996). Sociolinguistics. London: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (Eds.). (2009). Languages in Australian education: Problems, prospects and future directions. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Loveday, L. (1982). The sociolinguistics of learning and using a non-native language. Oxford; New York: Pergamon Press.

Nababan, P. W. (1993). Sosiolingustik: Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia.

Starling, M. (2013). Effect of bilingualism on verbal fluency tasks and a standardized neuropsychological assessment battery, in Polish-speaking sample. GRIN Verlag.

Sutrisno, B., & Ariesta, Y. (2019). Beyond the use of Code Mixing by Social Media Influencers in Instagram. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(6), 143-151.

Wardhaugh, R. (1972). TESOL: Our common cause. TESOL Quarterly, 291-303.

Wardaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (5th ed). New York: Blackwell.

Wiersma, W. (1991). Research Methods in Education : An Introduction. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.