Perbedaan Implicit Dan Explicit Bias Berdasarkan Perbedaan Identitas Agama Pada Mahasiswa Islam Dan Kristen Di Kota Makassar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56326/jpk.v4i1.3587Keywords:
Implicit Bias, Explicit Bias, IAT, Islam, KristenAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat perbedaan implicit dan explicit bias berdasarkan perbedaan identitas Agama pada mahasiswa Islam dan Kristen di Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode eksperimental dengan desain within subject design. Subjek dalam penelitian ini yaitu 120 mahasiswa, dengan jenis kelamin laki-laki = 25 (20.8%) perempuan = 95 (79.2%), mahasiswa Islam = 60 (50%) dan Kristen = 60 (50%). Pengukuran explicit bias menggunakan skala Religious Discrimination Scale (RDS) dan implicit bias menggunakan IAT. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan implisit bias berdasarkan perbedaan agama (p<.05), dimana partisipan beragama Islam memiliki skor implicit bias yang lebih tinggi dibanding partisipan yang beragama Kristen. Pada data explicit bias menunjukkan adanya perbedaan berdasarkan perbedaan agama (p<.05) partisipan Bergama Kristen secara explicit lebih tinggi dalam menunjukkan kecenderungan prasangka. Perbedaan data skor implicit bias dan explicit bias berdasarkan agama juga menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan, namun pada partisipan beragama Kristen tidak ditemukan perbedaan, pembahasan mengenai determinasi identitas agama sebagai faktor dalam prasangka secara explicit dan implisit dibahas lebih jauh pada penelitian ini.
References
Adelina, F. (2017). Hubungan Antara Prasangka Sosial dan Intensi Melakukan Diskriminasi Mahasiswa Etnis Jawa Terhadap Mahasiswa yang Berasal Dari Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Sains Psikologi. Volume 6, hal. 1-8.
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
Adryamarthanino, V. (2021). Konflik Poso: Latar Belakang, Kronologi, dan Penyelesaian. Kompas.com. Available at https://www.kompas.com/stori/read/2021/07/30/100000279/konflik-poso-latar-belakang-kronologi-dan-penyelesaian?page=all
Aisyah, B., & Yulianto, J. E. (2018). Pengaruh Agama Sebagai Identitas Sosial Terhadap Rejection Sensitivity Pada Mahasiswa Beragama Minoritas. Psychopreneur Journal. Vol.2(1), hal.19-29. https://doi.org/10.37715/psy.v2i1.864
Akrami, N., & Ekehammar, B. (2005). The association between implicit and explicit prejudice: The moderating role of motivation to control prejudiced reactions: Implicit and explicit prejudice. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00466.x
Allen, G. E. K., Wang, K. T., Richards, P. S., Ming, M. & Suh, H. N. (2018). Religious discrimination scale: Development and initial psychometric evaluation. Journal of Religion and Health, 1-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0617-z.
Allport, G. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, Religious Fundamentalism, Quest, and Prejudice. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr0202_5
Ashburn Nardo, L., Knowles, M.L., Monteith, M.J. (2003). Black Americans’ implicit racial associations and their implications for intergroup judgment. Social Cognition, 21(1), 61–87.
Baron, A, R., & Byrne, D. (2003). Psikologi sosial jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Baron, R. A. & Byrne, D. (2004). Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Baron, R.A., & Byrne, D. (1982). Social Psychology. Understanding Human Interaction. Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Batson, C. D., S. H. Eidelman, S. L. Higley, and S. A. Russell. (2001). “And who is thy neighbor?” II: Quest religion as a source of universal compassion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 40, 39–50.
Bertrand, M., Chugh, D., & Mullainathan, S. (2005). Implicit Discrimination. American Economic Review, 95(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670365
Cunningham, W. A., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., & Banaji, M. R. (2004). Separable Neural Components in the Processing of Black and White Faces. Psychological Science, 15(12), 806–813. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00760.x
Derks, B., Stedehouder, J., & Ito, T. A. (2015). Social identity modifies face perception: An ERP study of social categorization. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 10(5), 672-679.
Dion, K. L. (2003). Prejudice, Racism, and Discrimination. In Handbook of Psychology (pp. 507–536). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0521
Dotsch, R., & Wigboldus, D. H. J. (2008). Virtual prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1194–1198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.003
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Beach, K. R. (2003). Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: Examination of the Relationship between Measures of Intergroup Bias. In R. Brown & S. L. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes (pp. 175–197). Blackwell Publishers Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470693421.ch9
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., & Gaertner, S. L. (2002). Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(1), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B., & Howard, A. (1997). On the Nature of Prejudice: Automatic and Controlled Processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(5), 510–540. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1997.1331
Dunham, Y., Srinivasan, M., Dotsch, R., & Barner, D. (2014). Religion insulates ingroup evaluations: The development of intergroup attitudes in India. Developmental Science, 17(2), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12105
Fadeli, M. I., (2017). Hubungan Antara Prasangka Sosial dengan Toleransi Beragama pada Mahasiswa yang Mengikuti Organisasi Kemahasiswaan. Skripsi. Surabaya: Fakultas Psikologi dan Kesehatan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel.
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
Hafiyah, N., Puri, A., & Shadewi, R. (2011). Menguji Sikap Implisit Dengan Implicit Association Test. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 15(2), 94-108.
Hidayat, D. R. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Kemunculan Prasangka Sosial (Social Prejudice) Pada Pelajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi, 12(2), 40- 54.
Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1990). Social Motivation, Self-Esteem and Social Identity. In D. Abrams, & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances (pp. 28-47). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Huda, M. J. N. (2014). Dinamika Pencapaian Identitas Sosial Positif Ataskeistimewaan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, Vol. 2, No. 1, Halaman 30 – 41. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.2014.%25x
Imamah, S. (2021). Konflik Berbalut Agama: Papua SMenolak Pembangunan Menara Masjid. Kompasiana.com. Available at https://www.kompasiana.com/sholikhatulimamahsaaa22575/61b9ed4862a7047b062e3b32/konflik-berbalut-agama-papua-menolak-pembangunan-menara-masjid
Jacobs, C. M., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2013). Belonging In a “Christian Nation”: The Explicit and Implicit Associations between Religion and National Group Membership. Politics and Religion, 6(2), 373-401. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048312000697
Jaspars, J. M. S., & Warnaen, S. (1982). Intergroup Relation, Ethnic Identity and Self-evaluation in Indonesia, in H. Tajfel (ed) Social Identity andIntergroup Relation Relation. London: Cambridge University Press.
Kusnandar, V. B. (2021). Persentase Pemeluk Agama/Kepercayaan di Indonesia. databoks.katadata.co.id. Available at https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/09/30/sebanyak-8688-penduduk-indonesia-beragama-islam
Lam, S. K., Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., and Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: A social identity theory perspective. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 128-146. doi:10.2307/25764287
Lane, K.A., Banaji, M.R., Nosek, B.A. Greenwald, A.G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV: Procedures and validity. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 59-102). New York: Guilford Press.
Lewenussa, H. A., & Mashoedi, S. F. (2007). Hubungan Identitas Sosial dan Prasangka pada Remaja yang Mengalami Konflik di Ambon. JPS, 13, 141- 156.
Mahadi, S. (2023). 5 Konflik Agama Indonesia Paling Kontroversial dan Panas. Katanya Bhineka Tunggal Ika? Berita. 99.co. Available at https://berita.99.co/konflik-agama-indonesia/
Martin, M. R., A. H. Grande, and B. T. Crabb. (2004). Watch the war, hate Muslims more? Media exposure predicts implicit prejudice. Poster presented at the 16th meeting of the American Psychological Society. Chicago: IL
McConnell, A. R., & Leibold, J. M. (2001). Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37(5), 435–442. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1470
McGraw, K. M. (2000). Contributions of the cognitive approach to political psychology. Political Psychology, 21(4), 805–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00217
Nelson, T. D. (2002). The psychology of prejudice. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Nitayadnya, I. W. (2016). Ansietas Sew Roorda Van Eysinga Dalam Puisi “Hari Terakhir Orang Belanda Di Pulau Jawa”: Psikoanalisis Jacques Lacan (Anxiety of See Roorda Van Eysinga in the Poem “Hari Terakhir Orang Belanda Di Pulau Jawa”: Psychoanalysis of Jacques Lacan). Metasastra: Jurnal Penelitian Sastra. 8(1), 17-30.
Nosek, B. A., & Smyth, F. L. (2007). A Multitrait-Multimethod Validation of the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 14–29. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.54.1.14
Pettigrew, T. F. (2016). In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact. Annual Review of Psychology. 67(1), 1–21. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033327
Pietraszewski, D., Curry, O. S., Petersen, M. B., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2015). Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system. Cognition, 140, 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.007.
Pitaloka, Abidin, & Milla. (2018). Psikologi Sosial: Pengantan dalam Teori & Penelitian. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12006
Putra, I. A., & Wongkaren, Z. A. (2010). Konstruksi Skala Fundamentalisme Islam di Indonesia. Jurnal Psikobuana, 1, 151-161.
Putri, A. (2012). Toleransi Beragama di Indonesia Memprihatinkan. Tempo.co. Available at https://nasional.tempo.co/read/411665/toleransi-beragama-di-indonesia-memprihatinkan
Rahn, W. M. (1993). The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37(2), 472. doi:10.2307/2111381
Rowatt, W. C., Franklin, L. M., & Cotton, M. (2005). Patterns and Personality Correlates of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward Christians and Muslims. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44(1), 29–43.
Rudman, L. A., A. G. Greenwald, D. S. Mellott, and J. L. K. Schwartz. (1999). Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition 17:437–65.
Rudman, L. A., J. Feinberg, and K. Fairchild. (2002). Minority members’ implicit attitudes: Automatic ingroup bias as a function of group status. Social Cognition 20:294–320.
Sarifah, R. (2016). Identitas Sosial Dengan Prasangka Pada Prajurit Tni Ad Terhadap Anggota Kepolisian. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan, 4(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.22219/jipt.v4i1.2879
Sarwono, W. S. (2007). Psikologi Prasangka Orang Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sears, D. O. (1988). Symbolic racism. In Eliminating racism (pp. 53–84). Springer.
Stanovid, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the Relative Independence of Thinking Biases and Cognitive Ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.672.
Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information/sur les sciences sociales, 13(2), 65–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847401300204
Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behaviour. In: Worchel, S. and Austin, W.G., Eds., Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 2nd Edition, Nelson Hall, Chicago, 7-24.
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-37). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Taylor, Shelley E., Letitia Anne Peplau & David O. Sears. (2009). Psikologi Sosial Edisi Kedua Belas. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308, 1623 - 1626. DOI: 10.1126/scoence.1110589.
White, K., Argo, J. J., & Sengupta, J. (2012). Dissociative versus Associative Responses to Social Identity Threat: The Role of Consumer Self-Construal. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 704–719. doi:10.1086/664977
Willadsen-Jensen, E.C., Ito, T.A. (2008). A foot in both worlds: Asian Americans’ percep-tions of Asian, White, and racially ambiguous faces. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11(2), 182–200.
Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101–126. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.107.1.101
Ysseldyk, R., Matheson, K., & Anisman, H. (2010). Religiosity as identity: Toward an understanding of religion from a social identity perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 60-70. doi: 10.1177/1088868309349693
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kahlil Adnan, Patmawaty Taibe, Musawwir Musawwir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
