Analisis Kinerja Pegawai Dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Kecamatan Tallo

Authors

  • Handayani Handayani Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Bosowa
  • Delly Mustafa Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Bosowa
  • Juharni Juharni Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Bosowa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35965/pja.v2i1.4605

Keywords:

Kinerja, Remunerasi, Beban Kerja

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kinerja aparatur terkait dengan kualitas pelayanan di Kantor Kecamatan Tallo, menganalisis kualitas pelayanan di kantor Kecamatan Tallo Kota Makassar dan faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas aparatur pada peningkatan kualitas pelayanan di Kantor Kecamatan Tallo Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini menggunakan sampel Pegawai Negeri Sipil sebanyak 9 orang dan masyarakat 6 orang sedangkan sumber data menggunakan data primer dengan observasi dan wawancara mendalam menggunakan pedoman wawancara. Metode Penelitian dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif dilakukan dengan menyajikan data yang dimulai dengan menelaah data yang terkumpul, menyusun dalam satu kesatuan yang kemudian dikategorikan pada tahap berikutnya dan memeriksa keabsahan serta menafsirkannya dengan analisis kemampuan daya nalar peneliti untuk membuat kesimpulan penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa (1) Kinerja aparatur Kecamatan Tallo Kota Makassar, menurut tanggapan responden warga maupun tanggapan aparatur sudah berada pada kategori baik, Peningkatan pelayanan publik dari aspek berwujud dikategorikan sudah baik dan sudah memenuhi kebutuhan dalam pelayanan publik. Walaupun masih perlu ditingkatkan hingga mencapai kinerja yang maksimal. Secara umum kualitas pelayanan aparatur di Kecamatan sudah merujuk pada pelayanan yang prima serta aparatur mempunyai tanggung jawab atas pelaksanaan tugas yang diberikan oleh pimpinan, Dimana pelayanan adalah merupakan hal yang utama dalam pelayanan ke Masyarakat. (2) Kualitas pelayanan di Kantor Kecamatan Tallo meliputi lima dimensi dimana sebagi indikatornya yaitu berwujud (tangible), kehandalan (reliability), ketanggapan (responsivines), jaminan (assurance), empati (empahaty) dapat dikatakan sangat memuaskan/sangat positif. (3) Faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas pelayanan publik ada dua yaitu faktor internal dan faktor eksternal. Faktor internalnya yaitu prasarana yang memadai Dimana diruang pelayanan sudah dilengkapi dengan AC, terdapat mesin nomor urut antrian, tempat duduk tunggu sudah ada selain itu juga telah tersedia ruang baca untuk Masyarakat Ketika menunggu antrian. Sedangkan faktor eksternal yaitu pola layanan dan tata cara penyediaan layanan yang sudah maksimal.

This research aims to find out (1) To analyze the performance of the apparatus related to the quality of service at the Tallo District Office (2) To analyze the quality of service at the Tallo District office, Makassar City (3) Factors that influence the quality of the apparatus in improving the quality of service at the Tallo District Office Makassar city. This research used a sample of 9 civil servants and 6 people from the community, while the data source used primary data with observation and in-depth interviews using questionnaires. Research methods using qualitative analysis are carried out by presenting data starting with reviewing the collected data, arranging them into a single unit which is then categorized at the next stage and checking their validity and interpreting them by analyzing the researcher's reasoning abilities to make research conclusions. The results of this research show that: (1) The performance of the Tallo District apparatus, Makassar City, according to the responses of citizen respondents and the responses of the apparatus, is in the good category. Improvement of public services from the tangible aspect is categorized as good and has met the needs for public services. Although it still needs to be improved to reach maximum performance. In general, the quality of service for the apparatus in the District refers to excellent service and the apparatus has responsibility for carrying out the tasks assigned by the leadership, where service is the main thing in serving the community. (2) The quality of service at the Tallo District Office includes five dimensions, the indicators of which are tangible, reliability, responsiveness, assurance and empathy, which can be said to be very satisfying/very positive. (3) There are two factors that influence the quality of public services, namely internal factors and external factors. The internal factor is adequate infrastructure. The service room is equipped with air conditioning, there is a queue number machine, there are waiting seats, and there is also a reading room for the public when waiting in line. Meanwhile, external factors are service patterns and procedures for providing services that are optimal.

References

Amin, M. (2021). Effective Public Service Delivery: The Role of Employee Accuracy. Public Administration Review, 81(3), 520-532.

Arifin Nurhadi. (2020). Kinerja Pegawai: Konsep dan Implementasi. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 8(1), 45-60.

Bowen, G. A. (2020). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 10(2), 27-40.

Creswell, J. W. (2022). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Dessler, G. (2020). Human Resource Management (16th ed.). Pearson.

Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th ed.). Wiley.

Gronroos, C. (2020). Service Management and Marketing: Managing the Moment of Truth in Service Competition (4th ed.). Wiley.

Halim, A., & Rizal, M. (2022). Challenges in Public Service Delivery: The Role of Human Resources and Infrastructure. Journal of Public Administration Research, 17(1), 93-110.

Harahap, J. S., & Wibowo, A. (2024). Understanding the Dynamics of Public Service Innovation in Indonesian Municipalities. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 29(1), 25-40.

Kepel, I., & Rahardjo, B. (2021). Public Service Improvement and Quality Assessment. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 9(2), 115-130.

Khan, M. A. (2020). Impact of Facilities on Customer Satisfaction in Public Services. Public Management Review, 22(6), 855-872.

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2022). Marketing Management (16th ed.). Pearson.

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Kumar, R. (2021). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Lovelock, C., & Wirtz, J. (2022). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy (8th ed.). Pearson.

Mulyadi, Y. (2023). Public Administration and Service Excellence. International Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 58-74.

Nuryanto, A., & Nasution, M. A. (2021). The Role of Bureaucracy in Public Service Delivery: A Comparative Study of Indonesian Local Governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(3), 578-593.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (2021). SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 60(1), 12-40.

Purnomo, A., & Sari, R. (2022). Assessment of Employee Performance and Service Quality in Public Sector Organizations. Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 14(2), 88-105.

Putra, I. P., & Yuliana, S. (2023). Employee Performance and Public Service Quality: Case Study of Local Government Offices in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Public Administration, 12(1), 34-50.

Rakhman, A. (2019). Quality of Service: A Dynamic Perspective. Journal of Service Science and Management, 12(4), 45-60.

Rizki, N. (2021). Principles of Effective Public Service Delivery. Journal of Government and Public Policy, 13(3), 102-118.

Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational Behavior (19th ed.). Pearson.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2019). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Santosa, B., & Wijayanti, N. (2022). Innovation in Public Services: Evaluating the Impact of New Programs on Bureaucratic Performance. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 655-667.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2020). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (7th ed.). Wiley.

Sihombing, T. (2022). Improving Public Service Quality: Strategies and Implementation. Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(2), 245-259.

Susanto, S., & Rahayu, D. (2021). Public Service Facilities and Their Influence on Service Satisfaction. Asian Journal of Public Affairs, 13(4), 342-358.

UUD 1945 (2020). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Retrieved from https://www.setneg.go.id/uu-1945

Widodo, R., & Agustin, S. (2024). Assessing Public Sector Innovation: The Case of Makassar’s Service Improvement Programs. Journal of Urban Management, 19(2), 210-225.

Zeithaml, V. A., Bitner, M. J., & Gremler, D. D. (2020). Services Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Handayani, H., Mustafa, D., & Juharni, J. (2024). Analisis Kinerja Pegawai Dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik Di Kantor Kecamatan Tallo. Paradigma Journal of Administration, 2(1), 07–13. https://doi.org/10.35965/pja.v2i1.4605