ANALISIS PUTUSAN PERKARA PIDANA NO / 52 / PID.SUS – TPK / 2019 / PN. MKS TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
DECISION ANALYSIS OF CRIMINAL CASE NO / 52 / PID.SUS – TPK / 2019 / PN. MKS CONCERNING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION
Keywords:
Criminal Act, Corruption, Village FundAbstract
Thisaresearch aims to find out how the application of elements of corruption crimes and to know the basis of consideration of judges in deciding the case No:52/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN.Mks.
Thisaresearch was conducteda in makassar districtacourt using Normative research method using data collection techniques through interviews, literature studies, and documents. After analyzing the data obtained from the results of the study, the authors used qualitative approach data analysis techniques, which is a research procedure that produces descriptive data.
Based on the results of the study the author can conclude that the application of criminal law elements in the corruption of the Village Fund in the verdict No: 52/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/Pn.Mks has been in accordance with the subsidair indictment chosenaby the Panel of Judges stating thatathe accused was found guilty ofacorruption crimes stipulated in article 3 of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption. As well as in handing down the verdict against the corruption of village funds in the verdict No. 52/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/Pn.Mks, the panel of judges used juridical and sociological considerations. However, according to the author should judge using philosophical considerations.
References
Chazawi Adami, 2007, Pelajaran Hukum Pidana 1, PT. Raja Grafindo, Jakarta
Andi Hamzah, 1985, Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Graha Indonesia, Jakarta
Danil, E. 2016. Korupsi (Konsep Tindak Pidana dan Pemberantasannya). Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Effendi, E. 2011. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. PT.Refika Aditama, Bandung.
Gunadi, ismu dan junaedi effendi, 2014, Cepat dan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana, Kencana, Jakarta.
Komisi Pemberantas Korupsi. 2009. Buku Panduan Kamu buat Ngelawan Korupsi Pahami dulu Baru Lawan. KPK, Jakarta.
Mas,Marwan. 2014. Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor.
Martiman Prodjohamidjojo, 1984, Komentar atas KUHAP; Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana, Jakarta.
Munir Fuady, 2006, Teori Hukum Pembuktian; Pidana dan Perdata, Citra Aditya, Bandung
Nurman. 2015. Strategi Pembangunan Daerah. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Nuzil, A.S. 2014. Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. CV.Garuda Mas Sejahtera,Surabaya.
Prasetyo, T. 2016. Hukum Pidana. Rajawali Pers, Jakarta.
Ruslan Renggong, S. H. (2021). Hukum Pidana Khusus Memahami Delik-delik di Luar KUHP Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.
Rusli Muhammad, Potret LembagamPengadilan Indonesia, PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta
Soersono, R, 1992. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Sinar Grafika, Bandung.
Siahaan, M. 2013. Korupsi Penyakit Sosial yang Mematikan. PT.Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta.
Stout, H.D. 2016. Hukum Administrasi Negara. Edisi Revisi. PT.Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Sutiyoso Bambang, 2006, Metode Penemuan Hukum, Yogyakarta
Ifrani, 2017, Tindak Pidan Korupsi Sebagai Kejahatan Luar Biasa, Al’Adl, Volume IX No. 3, Hlm 323-324.
Jawade Hafidz, 2011, Sistem Pertanggungjawaban Perkara Korupsi dalam Rangka Percepatan Penyelamatan Uang Negara, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Volume 11 edisi Khusus, hlm 131-132.
Nyimas Latifah, 2016, Otonomi Desa dan Efektivitas Dana Desa, Jurnal Penelitian Politik, Volume 13 No.2, hlm 199.
Sina,La. 2008, Dampak dan Upaya Pemberantasan Serta Pengawasan Korupsi di Indonesia, Jurnal Hukum Pro Justicia, Volume 26 No. 1, hlm 41.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
KUHAP dan KUHP
Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman
Sovia Hasanah, Arti landasan filosofis, sosiologis, dan yuridis, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt59394de7562ff/arti/landasan-filosofis--sosiologis--dan-yuridis/
