ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP UTANG DEBITOR DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF DEBT DEBTORS IN DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATION DELAY
Keywords:
Debtors, Creditors, Suspension of Debt Payment ObligationsAbstract
This study aims to determine the application of formal and material requirements in the application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations in Decision Number 1/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Mks and the implementation of protection of creditor interests in the application for Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations in Decision Number 1/Pdt. Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Mks. The type of research used is empirical juridical, with data collection techniques through library research methods and field research methods using interview research instruments. and documentation. The data of this study were analyzed descriptively qualitative. Based on the researcher's analysis that the application of the formal and material requirements in the decision Number 1/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Mks has fulfilled the provisions stipulated by Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, the application for postponement of obligations debt payments can be granted. Since the stipulation of the postponement of debt payment obligations by the Panel of Judges. Creditors who as applicants for PKPU have fulfilled the protection of their interests, creditors get their rights and interests during the process of requesting a postponement of debt payment obligations, but creditors cannot directly collect debts from debtors because of the provisions and the judge has appointed a curator or implementation supervisory body in the process. request for postponement of debt payment obligations (PKPU). Based on the researcher's analysis that in the decision Number 1.Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Mks the implementation of the creditor's interest in the ongoing application for the postponement of the obligation to pay debts has fulfilled the provisions, protection and interests of the creditor have been fulfilled
References
Adhaper, Doni budiono, Analisis Pengaturan Hukum Acara Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Vol 4 nomor 2 (Juli-Desember 2018).
Arlan Okman1, Yulia A. Hasan2, Juliati M. Jafar, Tanggung Jawab Direksi Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Di Makassar (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 11/Pdt. Sus-Phi/2019/Pn.Mks. Clavia : Journal Of Law, Vol 18 No. 1 (Desember 2020)
Dinda Agita sari, Elvi Zahara, Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap syarat formil dan materiil UU No 37 Tahun 2004 terhadap perkara kepailitan pada putusan Nomor 09/Pdt.Sus-Pkpu/2015/Pn. Niaga Medan. Jurnal ilmiah penegakan hukum,
Purnama, A. S., Makkawaru, Z., & Tira, A. (2020). Tinjauan Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Redistribusi Tanah Pertanian Di Kabupaten Pangkajene Kepulauan: Legal Review Of Implementation Of Agricultural Redistribution In Pangkajene Kepulauan Regency. CLAVIA: Journal of Law, 18(1), 67-74.
Okman, A., Hasan, Y. A., & Jafar, J. M. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Direksi Dalam Perseroan Terbatas Di Makassar (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 11/Pdt. Sus-PHI/2019/PN. Mks): The Responsibility Of The Board Of Directors Is Limited To The Company In Makassar (Decision Number Case Study 11/Pdt. Sus-PHI/2019/PN. Mks). CLAVIA: Journal of Law, 18(1), 9-24.
Azikin, Elizah, Juliati M. Jafar, and Hamzah Taba. "Analisis Yuridis Perjanjian Gadai Tanah Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor. 56/prp/1960 Di Desa Parasangang Beru Kecamatan Turatea Kabupaten Jeneponto: Juridical Analysis Of Land Plant Agreement According To Law Number. 56/prp/1960 In Parasangang Beru Village, Turatea District, Jeneponto District." Clavia: Journal of Law 18.1 (2020): 33-40.
Penjelasan Umum UU No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
R. Anton Suyanto, pemanfaatan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang, kencan, Jakarta 2012
Putusan Nomor 1/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Mks
Wawancara di Pengadilan Negeri Makassar, tanggal 4 Oktober pukul 10.30 Wita.
